The petitioner said that the court had also ordered that in case anyone indulged in the misuse of any property, appropriate action in accordance with the law would be initiated against such a person. He submitted that the SHC on Novemhad ordered the SBCA, the KMC and Larp to ensure that no commercial activity was allowed in respect of the subject properties and also in respect of other properties within their jurisdictions, including that of the petitioner, without any discrimination. He also asked the court to direct the respondents to proceed according to the law and forfeit the lease of those residential plots. He asked the court to direct the respondents to fix responsibility on those who were involved in the connivance and had thus sheltered unlawful commercial activities on the residential plots. He submitted that on the one hand unlawful conversion of the said residential plots for commercial purposes frustrated the residential scheme, and on the other, commercial activities in the congested residential locality had created public nuisance, unlawful obstruction and physical discomfort. R-76 to R-86 and R-66 of Sector 8-A in Gulshan-e-Zahoor were being used for commercials purposes with the connivance of the respondents. He had submitted that residential plots Nos. Petitioner Agha Syed Attaullah sought implementation of the court’s directives against the use of residential plots for commercial purposes in Gulshan-e-Zahoor. The court had directed the KMC, the Karachi Development Authority and the SBCA to ensure that absolutely no commercial activity was allowed on residential plots in the city. The SHC also directed the Karachi Metropolitan Corporation (KMC), the Sindh Building Control Authority (SBCA) and the director of the Lines Area Redevelopment Project (Larp) to submit a compliance report with regard to action taken against the commercial use of residential areas across the city. The bench observed that it seemed that NAB had lost its interest to contest the appeal and so it dismissed the appeal on non-prosecution. The court also observed that NAB’s counsel was granted the final chance to prepare his arguments on the last date of hearing, but neither did the prosecutor appear nor was any intimation received.
The court observed that NAB’s prosecutor kept seeking adjournment for preparing the case for the past eight years. The SHC’s division bench headed by Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar observed that NAB had filed an appeal against the acquittal but their prosecutor failed to argue the appeal despite the passage of eight years. NAB had booked the former MNA in 2005 and filed a reference against her.
Salma agha atta ulla best trial#
The trial court had acquitted the former MNA of misappropriation of funds worth Rs13.3 million that were provided to her by the government for setting up a women’s complex and fashion designing technology institute in the Clifton neighbourhood in the mid-90s. NAB had filed an appeal against the acquittal of former MNA Begum Salma Ahmed, who also headed the Pakistan Association of Women Entrepreneurs, by the accountability court in 2011.
0 kommentar(er)
